Tucson council member Rocque Perez votes to continue free transit
- Aug 15, 2025
- 2 min read

This selected content is informed by various articles, including Tucson Spotlight, and is provided here for promotional purposes. That article remains the work of its original author and publication; inclusion on this site does not imply endorsement.
Tucson City Councilmember Rocque Perez voted to continue fare-free public transit in Tucson, helping secure a 5–2 decision to end efforts to reinstate fares on Sun Tran buses, the Sun Link streetcar, and other city transit services.
The vote preserves Tucson’s fare-free transit program, which has been in place since 2020 and serves thousands of daily riders who rely on public transportation for work, school, medical appointments, and essential travel.
Ahead of the vote, Perez publicly announced his position, emphasizing the impact reinstating fares would have on Tucson residents.
“Reinstating fares on our public transit system won’t make buses safer, but it will make life harder for the very people who rely on them most: working families, students, seniors, and those with disabilities,” Perez said. “If we’re serious about safety, let’s invest in driver support, service frequency, and compassionate alternatives — not pass the cost onto the rider.”
The Council’s action ends the current process to reinstate bus and streetcar fares, maintaining universal access to Tucson’s transit system. While reinstating fares would have generated revenue for the city, it also would have created new financial barriers for low-income residents and transit-dependent communities.
During deliberations, members discussed the City’s general fund contribution to transit operations and long-term funding strategies. Perez maintained that mobility access should remain central to the City’s approach, particularly for residents who depend on transit to participate fully in Tucson’s economy and civic life.
By voting to continue fare-free service, Perez aligned with the majority of Council in prioritizing access, affordability, and rider stability while broader funding conversations continue.


Comments